Aircraft Carrier Obsolete - In the fourth week of October 1944, the US Navy sank a Japanese ship. almost all. Japan lost 28 large surface fighters and more than 300 aircraft in the four-day Battle of Leyte Gulf off the east coast of the Philippines. Leyte Gulf was the last die for the Imperial Japanese Navy, which never recovered from defeat.
The Battle of Leyte Gulf is best remembered for the battleship's swan song, in which American radar-guided weapons scored dozens of hits on Japanese targets. A lesser-known fact is that it also marked the end of the carrier duel. Leyte Gulf was the last time warring parties deployed large numbers of aircraft carriers to seek out and destroy enemies on the high seas.
Aircraft Carrier Obsolete
If the age of fearless war was less than 40 years, the age of the warrior was less than 40 years. The first major naval operation in history was the Battle of Taranto in November 1940.
Aircraft Carriers: The Ultimate Weapon Or Obsolete?
Since World War II, aircraft carriers have dominated the world's seas, not only defeated but also unproven. With China developing cruise missiles with a range of more than 2,500 miles and Iran boasting that it is willing to do anything to achieve a glorious victory for an aircraft carrier strike, it seems unclear whether the ship's reign as king of the seas will continue. However, it is mistaken for the path of mission.
Aircraft carriers played an important role in the Allied victory in the Pacific in World War II. However, it is borderline normal to recognize that strategists are constantly preparing for yesterday's war. What about tomorrow's war? If freighters haven't fought for naval supremacy in the past 75 years, why do we expect that in the future?
I have to. Battles for supremacy in the Pacific were yesterday's battles, and carrier battles are tomorrow's battles. Neither China nor anyone else wants to attack Pearl Harbor again when the Philippine and Malaysian forces are trying to occupy the entire Indo-Pacific region. Surveillance satellites and nuclear-powered submarines have made key maritime missions like these obsolete.
The real goal of a 21st century aircraft carrier is to create an externally controlled alien zone. The American plane sits in the center of a circle with a radius of 500 miles. Within this circle, literally and figuratively, the United States makes all decisions.
Steve Blank Why The Navy Needs Disruption Now (part 1 Of 2)
The only restriction is that the center of the circle must float above the water, and even that is not as restrictive as it seems. Most of the world's population and economic activity is concentrated on the coast. Besides, much of what connects a country with the outside world travels through, through, or under the world's oceans. China's Belt and Road Initiative has largely failed to change that.
Of course, the Navy must be prepared for a naval battle that never comes, because it must be prepared for contingencies. That is why all American ships go to sea with a whole host of powerful auxiliary vessels. Despite their name, however, the purpose of carrier strike groups is not to actually strike. One million square miles of land must be occupied and occupied by all but the most well-armed and determined foes.
China and Russia can stop the US president from occupying and controlling their coasts, but the rest of the world is on his side.
Obviously, the US doesn't really "need" aircraft carriers. Air cargo today is a tool of foreign policy, not necessarily of national defense. No one attacks the United States, and if they do, land-based aircraft and submarines will provide the best defense. When it comes to protecting the world's shipping lanes, ships can do just that. F/A-18 does not conduct search and rescue operations.
Too Big To Sail? Us Aircraft Carriers Could Go The Way Of The Dinosaur
Aircraft carriers are the weapon of choice for temporary missions, not for critical missions. Carriers will have missions as long as the United States wants the option to have offshore capabilities. The Chinese news agency program should also be viewed in the same context. The airline would give China the ability to establish limited zones of control over land far from its borders, unless the US wants to own the same property.
Many defense analysts openly question the military's continued involvement in an age of precision missiles and drones. Others warn that the loss of one of these cities of 7,000 people to the sea would be so dire that the president and his advisers are reluctant to actually risk a war.
These skeptics are missing a bigger political point. American aircraft carriers can no longer be used in naval battles. They are designed to give the President control over a large portion of the Earth's surface and use it for the benefit of the United States, or at least to deny anyone else its use. Whether that power is worth it is questionable. But no other political tool can do that flexibly and effectively. Last December, for the first time in decades, no American fighter jets were deployed anywhere in the world. The Navy said it expects this to happen more often. Some media said this showed the decline of the US Navy.
The US Navy has problems, but not having enough carriers to move US Central Command isn't the biggest problem. Aircraft readiness in general and the sheer abhorrence of littoral combat ship/frigate programs are far more pressing issues for the Navy. Indeed, reducing the number of aircraft carriers could have positive consequences, and the Navy should evaluate other options to provide adequate presence against future threats.
The Future Of The Aircraft Carrier And The Carrier Air Wing > National Defense University Press > News Article View
For decades, the Navy has been obsessed with the need to answer President Bill Clinton's succinct question, "Where is the nearest aircraft carrier?" It has drained the Navy so much for so long that the service has stopped wondering if it is still the right question. It's not like that.
The Navy seems to believe that their ultimate goal is to keep aircraft carriers on base permanently. It just means. After all, people and things should be able to explode when the country's leadership needs it.
After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States was very concerned about the warships lost in the attack. Although the war resulted in heavy losses of men and capital ships, it became clear that the situation was not as bad as first thought. The aircraft carriers USS Enterprise, USS Lexington, and USS Saratoga did not dock at Pearl Harbor. As the battle progressed, it became clear that the focus of capital ships had shifted from battleships to aircraft carriers. Although battleships continued to play a heroic role in bombarding the Japanese fleet during the Pacific Campaign, they were no longer the main force in naval warfare.
Over the past 70 years, aircraft carriers have become battleships, today's shore bombing weapons. She's strong, but she's indecisive now. Aircraft carriers only have a place in our consciousness because they have not engaged in naval combat with a worthy adversary since the end of World War II.
Congress' Demands For Nuclear Powered Aircraft Carriers Are Sinking The Navy
The advantage of carriers at airports is that they are mobile. The downside is that it sinks. It will become more common as the weapons wielded by potential enemies become more and more powerful. For example, China has a fleet of at least 900 ballistic missiles with a range of 2,500 miles. In contrast, the fleet's most popular aircraft, the F/A-18E/F, has a fuel-free combat range of around 500 nautical miles, and the F-35C has a best estimate of 615. Both can be released in flight. However, the tankers themselves are vulnerable.
Without enough lethal cruise missiles, carrier battlegroups will face an even more deadly threat if they have to be in close range. Encountering China would mean a barrage of cruise missiles launched from shores, aircraft, surface ships and submarines.
Carrier guards such as the Arleigh Burke destroyer will find that the carrier's defenses will protect them for a while, but when faced with a serious and technologically competent adversary at home, each carrier will be the target of many weapons that will eventually fall. . The number of countries that can do this is growing.
Questions will be raised regarding medium and large powers. What political goals are worth losing an airline and 6,000 employees to? Such losses would more than double the number of deaths in Afghanistan over 13 years in one day. There are no shortcuts.
Zircon: The Russian Missile That May Render U.s. Aircraft Carriers Obsolete
Army aircraft carrier, aircraft carrier lego set, aircraft carrier lego, charleston aircraft carrier, midway aircraft carrier, lexington aircraft carrier, obsolete aircraft parts, aircraft carrier museum ships, obsolete aircraft, aircraft carrier san diego, aircraft carrier, lego navy aircraft carrier
0 Comments